About Me

           photo by Shelley Anderson

I am a doctoral candidate in the Department of Life Sciences Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I conduct research on the intersection of communication technology, public opinion and deliberation, and issues of science and emerging technology. In my dissertation, I examine how the social context of online media influences public participation in and public opinion of scientific issues.

My research has been published in International Journal of Public Opinion ResearchJournal of Nanoparticle Research, Materials Today, Nano Today, New Media & SocietyPublic Understanding of Science, and Social Science Quarterly. Currently, I am head graduate research assistant of the  Societal Implications Group at UW-Madison’s Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center on Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the Nanoscale.

I have experience teaching writing-intensive courses at the University of Wisconsin-Madison on communication theory and speech composition. Recently, I helped coordinate a new interdisciplinary class focused on the intersection of science and communication. The course is designed to engage graduate students from science departments and communication departments in cross-disciplinary dialogue, visits to research labs, and communication about science.

Prior to graduate school, I worked as an associate editor of a national monthly trade magazine and in corporate communications developing an internal newsletter and website for an international firm’s global business network.

Recent Posts

Information-seeking habits and their connection to trust

How people make sense of emerging technologies is an important question as applications are developed and as policies and regulations are formed for those technologies. One of the primary ways people handle information processing about emerging technologies is by turning to trusted sources of information about the issue. In general, and with regards to scientific issues, people use trust in various actors to reduce complexity. For instance, people may be more likely to support a new technology if they trust the scientists involved in its production.

A study I led on how individuals develop trust in institutional sources of information on nanotechnology was recently published in the International Journal of Public Opinion Research. In the study, we use national U.S. survey data to examine how predispositions developed in the educational system and how mass media use predict trust in governmental agencies and in scientists as sources of information about the risks and the benefits of nanotechnology.

Among other findings that show the important role of the value predisposition of deference to scientific authority, which is thought to be developed in our educational system, our study suggests that mass media use is a primary source of trust in these institutional actors. It is widely known that journalists rely heavily on institutional actors such as governmental actors or scientists in their reporting, and it appears those reporting habits are playing at least a partial role in encouraging trust in those institutional actors. Our study demonstrates that mass media sources shape who people turn to and trust in order to make sense of complex issues.

News literacy is increasingly important as information sources multiply in the digital age. People must critically think through the sources they encounter from not only these traditional institutional actors we identify in our study, but also from other non-traditional actors. Non-traditional sources of information in the online setting may include everyone from an independent scientist writing a blog to a casual acquaintance or close friend making a comment on Facebook. I think it is important to continue to clarify how these different types of information-seeking habits relate to trust, one key component of understanding how people make sense of complex issues.

  1. Communication technology through the eyes of a beginner 1 Reply
  2. The “So what?” of online comment research Leave a reply
  3. Ideas for organizing online deliberation Leave a reply
  4. Protest organization on the ground in Wisconsin Leave a reply
  5. Photos: Rally for workers’ rights at the state Capitol Leave a reply
  6. Culture, water, and the environment Leave a reply
  7. Flexing my muscles 2 Replies